Positive, however one may simply as simply say:
Sony A1: 9.44M dot EVF
Canon R3: 5.76 dot EVF
Sony A1: .9x magnification EVF
Canon R3: 0.76x magnification EVF
Sony A1: 240 FPS EVF
Canon R3: 120 FPS EVF
Personally, I take advantage of the EVF about 10x as a lot because the LCD. If given a alternative, I might have most popular to see an enchancment within the EVF over an enchancment within the LCD as in contrast with my R5. I do factor the EVF on the R5 is already fairly good, although additional magnification and a much less pixelated look would have been good.
Until Sony addressed the bizarre lack of contact display performance on their rear LCD, I might assume that that might be an even bigger annoyance than the 1.4mpx show.
All of us take images a bit otherwise. Personally I do not assume the LCD is a giant differentiator right here.